President Obama’s signature health care law is going to undermine doctor-patient relationships, close hospitals, cripple small businesses and result in rationed care, according to four health care professionals, including a congressional candidate, who spoke at a forum in Bethlehem Wednesday night.
The Lehigh Valley Coalition for Health Care Reform, a nonprofit with ties to conservative and physicians groups, presented the two-hour forum at Bethlehem Area Public Library to a sympathetic crowd of about 25. The panel included Laureen Cummings, a Scranton Tea Party founder and the Republican candidate for the redistricted 17th congressional district, currently held by Tim Holden.
Cummings, an LPN who owns a home health care agency in Old Forge, had a staffing service that paid nurses $40-$50 a hour to do temporary work in nursing homes but provided no health insurance. Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, she said she would have to provide health insurance to her nurses without lowering their wages and she can’t afford that.
The federal government is hiring many more IRS agents to enforce provisions of the new law, Cummings said, adding that she would love to get rid of the IRS.
“It’s celebrating its 100th birthday next year. I plan to stop that birthday from occurring,” she said to great applause.
Terry Ingalsbe, who received nursing degrees from Northampton Community College and Kutztown University, said she read the entire 2,700-page law. She claimed its real aim is to bring about a collapse of the current health care system and create a single-payer, single-provider system.
“Obamacare is not a safety net, it’s a straitjacket,” Ingalsbe said. It’s also a step toward total indoctrination of the nation’s youth into a secular, Marxist worldview and it gives the federal government more private information about individuals, including about their DNA, she said.
“The world that is created by secular Marxists and Obamacare has no room for God,” Ingalsbe said.
Dr. Thomas Bonekemper, a retired internist and past director of the Veterans Administration clinic in Allentown, and Dr. Joseph Grassi, a rehabilitation specialist, said new regulations plus cutbacks in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements from the government will mean fewer doctors will accept Medicare and Medicaid patients.
“Practices can’t stay open if they are reducing the Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rate,” Grassi said. “Our office is four physicians, we have close to 50 employees. When I started in the office 12 years ago, we had three people in the billing office. We now have eight full-time billing personnel and they can’t keep up with the regulations.”
“There will be severe restrictions on services to the elderly,” Bonekemper said. He said it will be a return to the days when HMOs paid doctors bonuses for ordering fewer tests for patients.
Grassi predicted that rather than pay for employees’ insurance, companies will shift the burden to the workers and instead pay a $2,000 fine per employee because it’s cheaper.
Bonekemper said one of the law’s biggest failures is the lack of tort reform, which would cap non-economic damages in jury awards to plaintiffs in medical malpractice cases. Such a move would bring down costs because doctors wouldn’t have to perform so many unnecessary tests in the name of practicing defensive medicine.
Cummings said she signed a pledge to repeal and replace the health care law. She joined Grassi in arguing that a key to making health care more affordable is to open it up to the free market, allowing insurance companies to compete across state lines.
Cummings was asked afterward if government involvement in health care is the problem, wouldn’t it make sense to end Medicare, Medicaid and the Veterans Administration health care system? “It’s impossible to end Medicare and Medicaid and the VA right now,” Cummings said. “I believe there are better ways to fix what’s broken.”
“Our solution has to be something that lessens the burden of what we’ve already got while at the same time providing good quality care for the patient,” Cummings said.
"The original draft LCD included onerous documentation requirements of multiple 12-week non-surgical interventions prior to authorizing coverage of a total joint replacement. After receiving comments from the AAOS and the American Academy of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS), the contractor stripped the onerous requirements from the LCD, making it so that only one non-surgical intervention needed to fail in order to meet the requirements of the LCD.
You don't know what you are talking about. If all of the defense spending was cut from the budget, the deficit would still be about $1 trillion based on 2011 data. We can't afford single payer, because we are broke already and the entitlements are leading us beyond the point of no return. Rather than push for single payer (which will result in less quality, less care, and more debt), I suggest we return to the old-fashioned way and pay for our own health care. But what do I know? I'm just one of those far-right nuts who think welfare should be reserved for the truly helpless, not for everybody.
Every doctor I know thinks this is a ridiculous situation, and the Affordable Health Care Act doesn't directly solve it. What the Affordable Health Care act does do, is make it far easier to get insurance coverage. The tea party jerks don't talk about fixing that -- they want to go back to driving families into bankruptcy. I consider it shamefully irresponsible of them to want to inflict such misery on people. If they have a comprehensive solution that's better than the Affordable Health Care Act, they should bring it forth -- but of course we all know they are far to intellectually lazy to do that.
Jim S. - just imagine getting sued every time you failed to use your directional in your car. That's what the medical provider is looking at. Imagine making $500,000/year, because you are good at what you do, but have to pay $40-60,0000 right off the top for malpractice insurance...and you never had a claim in 20 years. Reality gentlemen, not politics, reality.
Are you aware that the Affordable Health Care Act has already been revised by the CBO to cost way more than originally projected? Has any government program turned out within the projected cost, time, and quality? Isn't it possible that there is no "affordable" comprehensive solution? Or is that too intellectually lazy?
I am not right or left I'm around the middle like most other americans. My wife and I pay for our own health insurance. Over 600.00 per month and it's crap! We rarely go to the doctor. I'm for Single Payer. We could have it in Pennsylvania. House Bill 1660 - The Family and Business Healthcare Security Act is a bill that sitting in Harrisburg but our representatives won't bring it to the floor and talk about it. I want Healthcare 4 all Pa - http://healthcare4allpa.org/