This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Politics & Government

'Les Miserables' Makes Case for Complexity

Our polarized country could learn from 'Les Miserables.'

Les Misérables, the musical and now blockbuster movie, is a kind of Rorschach test. Some people see it primarily as a story of faith and redemption and others as a battle of good and evil in a class-driven society.

Others clasp on to the love stories – father and adopted daughter, the love triangle of Marius, Cosette and Éponine, the all-sacrificing mother Fantine. And then there are the moviegoers who don’t understand why all those characters have to keep breaking out in song.

But for me, one of the most resounding themes is the triumph of complexity over rigidity. French Police Inspector Javert sees Jean Valjean as bad because he stole a loaf of bread, served 19 years for his crime and then, upon his release, broke parole when society spat on him – literally and figuratively.

The rigid Javert, who keeps up his hunt for the fugitive Valjean, cannot alter his precepts to accept that the ex-con might be a good man who did a desperate thing to feed his sister’s son and another desperate act to survive on the outside. There is no room in Javert’s consciousness to imagine how the wretched poor might be driven to steal as Valjean did or sell their bodies as Fantine did.

The climax of that storyline comes when Javert is incredulous that Valjean has a chance to kill him and doesn’t. The inspector can’t reconcile his worldview with receiving mercy from a convict. Javert sings: “There is nothing at all that we share, it is either Valjean or Javert.”

It is this inability to see shades of gray (not the “Fifty Shades” that are giving modern female readers the vapors) that makes him the ultimate tragic character.

He has plenty of company in 21st Century America. The polarization of our country is reinforced with every election, every crisis, every Fox News and MSNBC broadcast.

And it manifests itself here in the Patch comment section when arguments devolve from reasoned debate into name calling on issues such as gun laws, the presidential election or the fiscal cliff.

In the first episode of “The West Wing” after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, the cast deviated from the regular plot lines to do a show called “Isaac and Ishmael” in which a bunch of school kids are caught in lockdown at the White House because of a terrorist threat.

Deputy Chief of Staff Josh Lyman talks to the teens about terrorists and then tells them to remember pluralism:

“You want to get these people? I mean, you really want to reach in and kill them where they live? Keep accepting more than one idea. It makes them absolutely crazy.”

Since we survived the Dec. 21  it looks like we’re all going to be stuck with each other for a while. Let’s resolve to look harder for common ground and practice civility even as we argue vigorously for our positions.

Although it’s hard to say what the future will bring, it looks like this is my last column for Patch. Thanks for reading. Good luck in 2013.

Find out what's happening in Bethlehemwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?