.
Feedback

Corbett: State Can't Absorb Medicaid Expansion Costs

Gov. Tom Corbett says that expanding Medicaid in accordance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act would cost the state millions of dollars that it doesn’t have.

By Melissa Daniels | PA Independent

HARRISBURG — Gov. Tom Corbett said that expanding Medicaid in accordance with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act would cost the state millions of dollars that it doesn’t have.

“I don’t think there’s any way we can absorb this,” Corbett said of the expansion costs, while speaking to the Pennsylvania Press Club recently.

As multiple states make their announcements on whether or not to expand Medicaid to more residents, Pennsylvania has yet to come out one way or the other. But Corbett was specific in citing associated costs, adding that Pennsylvania may not have room in the budget to cover them.

Kevin Harley, Corbett’s press secretary, said later that the state is still waiting to hear back from the federal government on certain questions before making a decision.

But there’s little flexibility in the timeline. If the state decides to opt into the expansion, it would have to allocate resources in its 2013-2014 budget, as the new Medicaid eligibility standards will kick in that fiscal year.

“In a very tight budget year, with revenues very tight, it becomes a question we have to look at seriously,” Corbett said.

While costs for newly eligible residents will be covered by the federal government in full, costs for residents who join and were previously eligible are not.

Without opting into the expansion, these “woodwork” costs would be $134 million, Corbett said, reading off notes he brought up to the podium ahead of time. A limited expansion would cost an estimated $178 million in that year, and full expansion would be almost $222 million, Corbett said.

By 2021, the state would need to spend more than $4 billion in connection with a full expansion, Corbett said.

Spending on Medicaid and other social services takes up around 38 percent of the annual budget as it stands, Corbett said. 

Walter November 26, 2012 at 11:22 am
Not a problem.
Just raise taxes to cover it. Dig Deep.
Amend November 26, 2012 at 01:56 pm
Seems the state has plenty of money to support it's prison industrial complex tho.
optimist November 26, 2012 at 03:51 pm
Ya and the state had no problem funding an expensive effort to demand photo ID's, pass an EITC tax credit that allows the state to refund people who give me money to private schools, and give additional tax breaks to corporations.
diamond li'l November 26, 2012 at 04:07 pm
Let's get real. This whole Obamacare situation is a drain on everyone including companies, states, medical services, and people in general. It is nothing but another way of getting taxes out of all of us. It really will do nothing at all to improve healthcare.
optimist November 26, 2012 at 04:27 pm
I agree we need to get back to denying people based on pre-existing conditions and making sure insurance companies make as much money as possible which is after all the real goal of health care.
Crestor Januvia November 26, 2012 at 04:59 pm
Maybe if the scum in the prison didn't commit crimes, we would not need the prisons. And the scum is a function of our lazy ass welfare society. Did you convert while you were in?
Crestor Januvia November 26, 2012 at 05:00 pm
Employers are already cutting employees back to 29 hours so they don't have to pay for Obamacare..... didn't figure on this, did you, crap for brains Obama. Now, the end result of your big idea is to cost MILLIONS extra pay as their hours are cut. MORON DEMOCRATS.
Crestor Januvia November 26, 2012 at 05:01 pm
Quick... pass a Federal law that says all employees have to work at least 30 hours... then the owners will fire them. MORONS.
mark wood November 26, 2012 at 05:26 pm
do what Louisana did, you'll love it, here is a hint, retired folk avoid this state for this reason. Give up?. look it up, its good you...lol
diamond li'l November 26, 2012 at 06:10 pm
Dear Optimist...that is not the issue. No one wants to deny people based on pre-existing conditions. You need the read all 2,700 pages of the heathcare?solution. It is not a way to improve healthcare. It is a form of taxation and they pull the wool over the eyes of people like you.
Amend November 26, 2012 at 11:28 pm
@Crestor- it's more accurate to state that the expansion of the welfare state is due to the ineffectual nature of our criminal justice system. Anyone who doesn't question a 500% increase in incarceration rates over the past 30 years is either blind or a fool.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Bethlehem Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
An interested bystander May 6, 2013 at 05:29 pm
Just pointing out facts. You are also forgetting that money withdrawn from an IRA or 401k (exceptRead More Roth IRAs) are taxed at withdrawal. I prefer my government not punish good financial actions. Sorry it's a quirk of mine, I think we should reward those who make good decisions, not punish them.
Tony Simek May 6, 2013 at 06:35 pm
I agree with you Interested Bystander. Problem is that if you punish the ones making the badRead More decisions, the Federal government will be punished all the time. In the current climate, poor decision making gets rewarded by voters. The middle class doesn't have a chance.
Bill May 9, 2013 at 05:11 am
Naziti and Caroline Johnson so sorry to take so long to get back to you from your comments onRead More Sunday, May 5th, I didn't think I would have to respond. I re-posted Ken's comment because the REAL issue is "AARP selling out it's faithful supporters for BIG MONEY. So let me break it down so even the Soros trolls understand. ObamaCare guts SS and medicare reserve money by 750 Billion. Which ends these programs as we know them. AARP publicly backs ObamaCare. Seniors confused about OCare but trust AARP and their massive ad campaign for OCare. AARP contributes to re-election AARP becomes insurance provided for OCare. Unleashes host of insurance options that Seniors will be needing to make decisions about in next 2-3 years. Complicate the choices for Seniors so they fall back on who they have trusted in the past. Still unaware of the great deception perpetrated by AARP. OCARE fully enacted 2014. AARP gets steady $$$ insurance income now (not $16 membership fees for whoever posted that line above). SS and MediCare bankrupt (3/4 trillion $ stolen to fund OCare) Result for SENIORS. NO SS or MEDicare it's dissolved or becomes something less. Free OCare that sucks. Pay AARP for supplemental Ins. Prescriptions too expensive to purchase so go without or pay AARP for better plan. AARP richer and more powerful represents Gvmt Seniors - Self rule lost You see they screwed the very people that paid dues for their protection!