.
Feedback

Are We Electing a President or a Sunday School Teacher?

How determinative should a person's alignment with our own faith be to casting our vote?

The first several months of the presidential election season was mostly about economic issues and questions about the size and role of government. However, the focus has abruptly changed to culture war issues in recent weeks, and in the process has brought religious affiliation, actual or presumed, to the center of the discussion.

“Is Candidate A really a Christian? Is Candidate B’s religion the correct religion? Is Candidate C really the right kind of Christian?”

Millions go to the polls and pull the lever for one candidate or another for a myriad of reasons. Some are motivated by specific issues; others by a general governing philosophy. Some have been inspired by particular ideas; others simply by the candidate’s personal likeableness.

Rhetoric from the conservative edges of the political spectrum sometimes seems to suggest that being a Christian, even a particular brand of Christian, is to be a highly considered qualification for office. For some, it would even seem that a candidate being “their kind of Christian” is determinative, or nearly so.

But I’ve got to ask, are we voting for a religious leader or a political leader; are we electing the President of the United States or a Sunday School teacher?

Think of it this way. How do we choose a mechanic for our car? It would be nice that he shares our faith. It would give us a sense of shared interest and commonality with him. But what if he isn’t a very good mechanic? Would we take our car to the mechanic around the corner who has a solid record of fixing cars but also is known for his foul mouth and the girly picture calendar in his office? Or would we go to the mechanic who frequently doesn’t get the problem fixed right yet sings hymns while working on our car?

What about choosing a surgeon to operate on our spine? If we can find a really good surgeon who also will pray that Jesus helps her while operating on our neck, that’s awesome. But what if the surgeon prays a lot, but also has a number of malpractice suits against her? Would we instead opt for the well-renowned spine surgeon across town who is an atheist?

Coming back to candidates for political office. Is it better to vote for an inexperienced, careless, or ineffective politician who reads the Bible and prays daily and goes to church every Sunday? Or is it better to vote for an effective political leader who is irreligious or of a different religion than ours?

How determinative should a person’s alignment with our own faith be to casting our vote? Consider Jeroboam II in 2 Kings 14. By no means was he godly. But he sure did lead the nation of Israel effectively. God condoned none of the evil in his life, yet He still worked through the leadership skill of Jeroboam.

The Christian faith of a candidate who happens to be otherwise well qualified for the office for which they are running may be a nice bonus. But beyond that, how does the Christian faith of a candidate figure into the equation of whether he/she is actually qualified to hold the office for which he/she is running?

BethTwp March 9, 2012 at 12:28 am
We do not elect a president who clearly shows his disregard for religion. He claimed change but most people didn't realize the change they were about to get.
Read the below article that has foonotes with articles: http://www.wallbuilders.com/LIBissuesArticles.asp?id=106938

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Bethlehem Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
An interested bystander May 6, 2013 at 05:29 pm
Just pointing out facts. You are also forgetting that money withdrawn from an IRA or 401k (exceptRead More Roth IRAs) are taxed at withdrawal. I prefer my government not punish good financial actions. Sorry it's a quirk of mine, I think we should reward those who make good decisions, not punish them.
Tony Simek May 6, 2013 at 06:35 pm
I agree with you Interested Bystander. Problem is that if you punish the ones making the badRead More decisions, the Federal government will be punished all the time. In the current climate, poor decision making gets rewarded by voters. The middle class doesn't have a chance.
Bill May 9, 2013 at 05:11 am
Naziti and Caroline Johnson so sorry to take so long to get back to you from your comments onRead More Sunday, May 5th, I didn't think I would have to respond. I re-posted Ken's comment because the REAL issue is "AARP selling out it's faithful supporters for BIG MONEY. So let me break it down so even the Soros trolls understand. ObamaCare guts SS and medicare reserve money by 750 Billion. Which ends these programs as we know them. AARP publicly backs ObamaCare. Seniors confused about OCare but trust AARP and their massive ad campaign for OCare. AARP contributes to re-election AARP becomes insurance provided for OCare. Unleashes host of insurance options that Seniors will be needing to make decisions about in next 2-3 years. Complicate the choices for Seniors so they fall back on who they have trusted in the past. Still unaware of the great deception perpetrated by AARP. OCARE fully enacted 2014. AARP gets steady $$$ insurance income now (not $16 membership fees for whoever posted that line above). SS and MediCare bankrupt (3/4 trillion $ stolen to fund OCare) Result for SENIORS. NO SS or MEDicare it's dissolved or becomes something less. Free OCare that sucks. Pay AARP for supplemental Ins. Prescriptions too expensive to purchase so go without or pay AARP for better plan. AARP richer and more powerful represents Gvmt Seniors - Self rule lost You see they screwed the very people that paid dues for their protection!