patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Purpose of Pa. Voter I.D. Law "Appears to Be a Sham"

Political analysts say Pa. voter I.D. law potentially disenfranchises hundreds of thousands

 

Written by G. Terry Madonna & Michael L. Young

 

What should we think about Pennsylvania’s new voter ID law set to take effect for the 2012 presidential election? The law requires all voters to provide stringently prescribed photo ID every time they vote.

Enacted this spring, it unleashed a cascade of contention since Governor Tom Corbett signed it in March. It has been hailed, assailed, praised, condemned, defended, attacked, cursed and blessed.

Most Pennsylvanians like it according to polls, although the same polls suggest many don’t understand it well. The law’s goal, to prevent voter fraud, enjoys universal support, yet doubt exists that much fraud actually exists.

Sorting out the facts of Voter ID—many of which we are only now learning—doesn’t paint an encouraging picture.

  • The law’s purpose appears to be a sham.

Its stated objective, to prevent voter fraud, seems to be a classic case of a solution looking for a problem. Evidence of significant voter fraud is virtually nonexistent.

Nationally, not a single person was found guilty of impersonating another voter between 2002 and 2007 (the latest data available). A GOP advocacy group last year did identify 400 fraud prosecutions over the previous decade. Even if true, however, this would still be less than one fraud a year per state.

In Pennsylvania alone, there have been only four fraud convictions over the last eight years, none of which would have been prevented by the new law.

  • The law potentially disenfranchises hundreds of thousands.

Using data recently released by the Corbett administration, some 750,000 Pennsylvanians could be barred from voting by the law.

But legislators voting for the bill in March were told the law would affect as few as one tenth of one percent of voters. The highest estimate was put at 100,000 voters. Putting the kindest construction on it, the March legislation was sloppily prepared before being rushed through the legislature without consideration of its potential impact.

  • The law is politically motivated.

Voter suppression (i.e., discouraging certain groups from voting) is apparently the real motivation of the law. Republicans have frantically denied this, but their own House majority leader publicly acknowledged it last month.

Showing perhaps more candor than canniness, Representative Mike Turzai implied the law had the partisan goal of winning the presidential election for Mitt Romney.

“Voter ID,” proclaimed Turzai, “is going to allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania.” Smoking guns don’t get clearer than that.

  • The law is discriminatory.

It disproportionately hits Democratic voters, notably older, younger, minority and poor voters. However, it also will affect Republican voters statewide.

The GOP stronghold of Cumberland County is estimated to have the largest number of affected voters outside Philadelphia. Cumberland is closely followed by Republican Cameron County.

The stunning high numbers of voters involved evoke sordid memories of voters suppression techniques practiced in the American South in the pre-civil rights era.

  • The law is duplicative.

Almost undiscussed is that Pennsylvania already has a voter ID law in place for first-time voters. It is one that has been neither difficult to implement nor controversial.

Now, by replacing a simple law that works with a convoluted one that won’t, it’s difficult to avoid the conclusion that more sinister motives were at work in passing Voter ID. In fixing what was not broken, the legislature risks breaking what was already fixed.

  • The legislation is untested.

The Corbett administration ran a trial run of Voter ID during the spring 2012 primary, but with few races and low turnout, it provided no real test of what will happen during a close presidential election with high turnout.

We are barely 12 years from the national agony suffered in 2000 in the disputed Bush/Gore election. But that electoral calamity may be mild compared to what these voter ID laws can produce. And counting Pennsylvania, some 30 states may have new voter ID laws on their books by November.

The conclusions are inescapable.

Voter ID was not well thought out, planned or executed. Many legislators voting for it did not know how many people would be affected. In addition, the noxious whiff of voter suppression motives is pervasive. There cannot be a greater crime in a democracy than systematically attempting to prevent eligible voters from exercising the franchise. It’s truly a repulsive act.

What should we do now?

Common sense screams the obvious solution.

We should simply suspend implementation of the new law until an election or two of trial runs shows us how it works and with what effects. Rolling it out in the middle of a presidential contest is sheer folly.

There are many ways to delay implementation. The simplest is for Governor Corbett to declare a moratorium on applying Voter ID until it has been thoroughly studied. The courts can also do it, and many believe they will.

However we do it, the 2012 presidential election is the wrong time to introduce Voter ID to Pennsylvania. In an age of seemingly insoluble problems and endless challenges, this is one we can still avoid.

Related Topics: 2012 election, Pa. Voter ID, Pa. Voter ID Law, Pennsylvania politics, Voter ID law, and gov. tom corbett

Rich

7:11 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

I can tell you where I vote, there is such a lax attitude in the past, almost any male could have come in an voted using my name and signature (I scribble my signature.) I am positive that some people allowed others to do this in their name as I have heard them first hand say so. Also, how many people know that their voter registratiion card is actually useless becuase you don't have to show it not even have it with you. Let's ee you drive leagally without a license, registration card, plates, or insurance. When is the priveldge of driving a car less important that a person's actaul guaranteed freedom to vote and have it not countered by an illegaly vote.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daryl Nerl

3:33 am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Driving is a privilege earned when you obtain a license. Voting is a right guaranteed in the Constitution for any U.S. citizen who is at least 18 years of age. Big, big difference.

Robert Sentner

8:34 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

Here we go again, what is the big freakin deal???? where don't you have to show an ID. And correct me if I am wrong but can't you get a free ID in PA ??? enough of stirring the pot.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carl W

3:21 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012

Yes it's free.......to recipient at the moment acquired.

It has already cost our State millions !

Amend Wun

9:14 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

So the possibility of potential voter suppression of 750,000 citizens by one political party towards another isn't more troubling to you then the possibility that one persons in a million commits voter fraud? It's not about how simple it is to get a proper ID to vote, it's the intent of the legislation that is the question. It smacks of discrimination and out right corruption.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

2:27 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

I am sure some of the 750,000 supposedly suppressed people would be republicans voting for Romney. Or even Democrats voting for Romney! You need an ID for everything in this country. Including buying cough syrup, cashing a check and seeing your dr. I say encouraging more people to get picture ID's will only improve the quality of their lives and make sure that only people who should be voting are voting.

Comment_arrow

Carl W

3:23 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012

Thank you, also, "Amend." A-men!!!

Frightwingslayer

9:17 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

I'll tell you what the big deal is...There was no problem and the legislature spent millions of taxpayers dollars to fix something that wasnt broken..It's a real hassle trying to get an ID in Pa. ( See Bill White's recent column in MCall) Worst of all , the specific intent was to defranchise voters of one party..That's cheating..Period!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's not enough that they have billions of dollars flowing into their coffers thanks to "Citizen's United" but ontop of that they have to still cheat to win..How Pathetic is that???

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff

5:27 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

How does this cost "millions"? As a U.S. citizen you need to have Identification for almost anything you do. How is it that it always comes to the Republicans are gonna benefit from it?? I guess that really shows how scared the leftys are that real live breathing American citizens are the ones casting votes! LMAO

Lets see, no ID, no check cashing, no ID, not able to open a bank account. No ID, no privilege to operate a motor vehicle. No ID, can't board a plane. No ID when stopped by police, go to jail. No ID, thats just fine, step right up and vote for our elected leaders.......you people are a bit DAFT!

Robert Sentner

9:25 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

If polled and maybe thats what patch should do is poll they readers, but who doesn't have ID. You need it for everything nowadays, from cashing a check, driving a car, getting on a plane, getting your welfare check, picking your son or daughter up from daycare, going to the Dr. how do you function without one. And I am so sick and tired of hearing about the cheating, If the current president was doing a bang up job there would be no worry about getting him re-elected. He is doing a terrible job and should be replaced, just like the last one. And if you want to argue about what a great job he is doing have at it. I am neither republican or democratic so I have no skin in the game. voter ID just makes sense to me.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daryl Nerl

3:29 am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Actually, we've addressed this -- not with a poll -- but with hard data supplied by the state. http://patch.com/A-vVWN
Currently, there are 22,000 active voters in the Lehigh Valley who do not have valid IDs under the new law. Were all of them committing voter fraud in the last election? The evidence suggests that not even one of them was. And no one here has produced any evidence that says otherwise.
This is not driving privileges. This is not check cashing. This is not flying in an airplane. Those are privileges. Voting is a RIGHT guaranteed to all U.S. citizens who are at least 18 years old. This law treads on that and 22,000 of your neighbors. I find that unacceptable.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

2:30 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

My 89 yr old mother just got a picture ID so she can vote. It was not and is not a big deal. If you can get yourself down to the polling place to vote why can't you get a photo ID so you can vote and do so much more?

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daryl Nerl

8:17 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

And how did your 89-year-old mother get to a PennDOT office to get her ID? Did you drive her? Are you offering rides to the 22,000 registered voters in the Lehigh Valley who do not have photo IDs now?
Where is the common sense folks? They don't have IDs because they don't drive. How would you like to be "required" to get to a PennDOT office in the Lehigh Valley to exercise your right to vote when you don't drive?
You are taking your own privilege and their rights for granted.

Comment_arrow

Liberalism is a mental disorder

10:14 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

You liberals hate this law because you depend on voter fraud. Massive fraud. If you are too stupid to get an ID, you probably should not vote anyway. Too many stupid voters is a big big problem.

Comment_arrow

Rosemary B

1:06 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

My question remains, how do you get to the polling place to vote if you can't even get out to get an ID? And, yes, I would volunteer to drive anyone who needs a ride to get an ID. I believe it will not only make our elections more accurate but improve the quality of life for those who obtain id.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daryl Nerl

1:19 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Because polling places are generally walkable from home while PennDOT ID centers are not. This isn't rocket science, Rosemary. But that is a generous offer to give people rides. Should I post an announcement in our Lehigh Valley Patches?

Arthur

10:12 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

The same people who object to voter I. D. put in place an I.D. requirement to see your doctor. They have also implemented a voter I.D. at the Democratic National Convention where all the delegates must have photo identification. This entire complaint about voter I.D. is nothing more than a hypocracy and an attempt to make sure that voter fraud will continue.
P.S. Anyone who grew up and voted in Philadelphia, as I did, knows that voter fraud happens all the time.

Reply

Frightwingslayer

11:00 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

Yea Aurthur, It happens so often that no one noticed..Give me a break..Are you that freaking stupid??? It cost millions to put this law into effect and the only reason it was done was to suppress the vote..Thank God the Republican rep finally admitted that...Geez people , are you that ignorant, really??

Reply

Arthur

11:40 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

Frightwingslayer: It would not have costs millions if honest people would simply put the law into effect without the needless challanges. It is only logical that people have ID to vote. The people who want to protect voter fraud are challanging vote ID everywhere. This will not stop voter fraud completely because it will not stop party functionaries from casting votes for people who don't show up at the polls. It does happen in some places and anyone who denies it is either naive or just ignoring facts.

Reply

Sheriffchris

11:55 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

With all the fraud, with all the Identity theft that has been prevalent for the last 10 years I wonder why some would get so upset over Voter Id's. What are they trying to hide I wonder? I can't pass a check, even to people who know me, without my ID. Can't take a medical test (MRI) without ID. Can Fly on a plane without ID. OMG Just what is the big deal anyway ???? What are you in fear of ??

Reply

gruntled

2:32 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

I remember seeing something here (last month?) about the Easton Republicans putting on a seminar to help folks get ID and was offering rides to Democrats, Republicans and even Communists.
Doesn't sound like disenfranchisement to me.
It's the law; more than half of all states have elected governments that enacted this legislation.
Quit whining, fer pity sake. Just get an ID, so you'll be able to buy a beer at the next Heritage Day.

Reply

Rob Hamill

4:43 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

Time to get the 20% voter fraud out of the democratic Philly precincts that all have 100% turnout, They have been throwing rigged elections forever backed by democratic party bosses and corrupt precincts. Hurray for the sanctity of my vote!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daryl Nerl

10:34 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

You don't need proof to take away the voting rights of 750,000 Pennsylvanians? Well King George, you are clearly in the wrong country and on the wrong Website. If you don't like us, why don't you just go away? We really don't need hateful people here.

Elsa

7:50 am on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

It is only a sham to those who use illegals to win elections

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daryl Nerl

12:03 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

And there is absolutely no proof that this has happened -- ever.

Comment_arrow

Liberalism is a mental disorder

10:16 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

You don't need proof. It makes total sense to have to prove who you are before you vote. Unions do it. You need an ID to get into an Obama speech. Anybody with a brain can figure this out... unless the real objective is keeping the voter fraud machine running.

sherry

8:04 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

I don't see a problem with requiring ID. I only wonder why it took so long to do this.
Yes, I have to show my ID everywhere just like everyone else does.
Instead of complaining about it, get up off your couch if you don't have one and do it before November comes around.

Reply

Liberalism is a mental disorder

10:17 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Is every Patch writer a liberal. God this is exhausting. I guess conservatives are too busy working and can't and don't have time to write columns. I guess this is where all the unemployed journalism majors hang out.

Reply
Comment_arrow

matt

11:52 am on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Answer is yes. Most of them are Morning Call cast-offs. What do you expect.

Comment_arrow

Peter

6:29 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

most "journalists" are liberal...they're just like college professors, no real-world experience, no way to relate to the regular working people.

Liberalism is a mental disorder

10:18 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Ya, it will allow Romney to win by suppressing the KEY fraud vote from Philadelphia and other areas.

Reply

Wayne Schissler

11:04 pm on Tuesday, July 17, 2012

To claim that there is no fraud because there are no convictions is naive. If a political machine/party "owns" the county who is going to prosecute, let alone file a complaint? There are reports of unusually high voter turnouts and numbers that don't match up in PA precincts but I guess these reporters didn't want anything getting in the way of the "sham" sensationalism slant of their piece.
http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2012/04/20/philly-election-officials-take-up-gop-complaints/

Reply

Arthur

11:51 am on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

I remember, while in Philadelphia, some voting districts had more people voting Democrat than there were registered voters in the district!

Reply

Peter

1:39 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

"The stunning high numbers of voters involved evoke sordid memories of voters suppression techniques practiced in the American South in the pre-civil rights era."

Jeepers Cats, Daryl...can't you find better arguments than using the same tired tactics liberal "journalists" always use? Trying to associate racism to requiring an ID to vote? Really?

Reply

Andrew Wilt

1:54 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Daryl Nerl - You wrote that driving is a "privilege earned when you obtain a license." Not that this comment is related to voter ID, and I'm not disputing that what you wrote is the case, but I would like to ask you something. At this time, no "license" is needed to walk down the street. No "license" is needed to ride a bike down the street. Why then, the Constitutional right to pursuit of happiness which includes freely traveling about still being in place, is a "license" needed when one uses something with a motor in it to travel down the street?

Reply

Walter

7:02 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

While so many people are asking for proof of this or that …
Would someone please show me how this affects either party more than the other?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeff

8:59 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Walter, statistics from Philly indicate that there was more votes cast than there are registered voters(living voters anyway) People have checked into this stuff all around the country and have found similar things goin on all over. This is where the problem lies, anyone can walk into the polls and give them a name they read in the obituaries and be given the chance to vote. There is many videos on Youtube showing this.

Carl W

3:17 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012

A+++ to authors for last segment. NOW is not the time (if ever) to suddenly implement a law like this. Thank you, Terry & Michael !!!!!

Reply

Ann Melby Shenkle

10:38 am on Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Thank you Patch for a terrific piece exposing the facts on the Republican effort to steal votes. Now the Republicans should be required to pay back every cent that has been wasted passing, enforcing, and defending what should have been obvious from the beginning. If we can't retrieve the cash thrown away on this, we should use our votes to pitch out the Republicans legislators that put the law in play.

Reply

Leave a comment